The spokesperson added that families of unaccompanied asylum seeker children were more likely not to want any publicity than Irish families. He insisted there was regular communication between the HSE areas and the Garda once a case of a missing asylum-seeking child had been referred to them. While a spokesperson for the HSE east coast area agreed, an HSE southern area spokesperson admitted this contact was "not regular enough". Corbett said he was "tremendously concerned" about the lack of resources for services for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the Republic. [1]
Under the Carers (Recognition and Service) Act 1995, both adult and child carers have a right to an assessment of their needs as carers. The preferred intervention should be the provision of services and support to enable the child/young person to remain in the family home with adequate opportunities for their own development activity, unless it is clear from the assessment that this is not possible without causing significant harm to the child. A UASC is an asylum-seeking child under the age of 18 who is not living with their parent, relative or guardian in the UK. Safeguarding & Specialist Services should carry out an Initial Assessment and, where appropriate, a care assessment of needs for every child referred to them by Immigration Services, regardless of their immigration status. Based on this assessment, under the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (2000), Safeguarding & Specialist Services have a duty to provide appropriate support and services to all UASC, as these children should be provided with the same quality of individual assessment and related services as any other child presenting as being 'in need'. In the majority of cases, this assessment leads to them being accommodated. Once UASC become accommodated children under s20 of the Children Act 1989, they are required to be the subject of a care plan (pathway plan at 16+).[2]
There are a further 10 asylum-seeking minors missing from the care of the HSE who went missing in previous years. All unaccompanied minors who seek asylum are placed in the care of the HSE. A spokesperson for the HSE said, "The suspicion is that many of these children who have absconded may have pre-planned this with persons unknown prior to entering the country. This is done with the objective of reuniting with their families, who have already arrived in the state, or with the intention of relocating to other European countries where their families are located." According to a 2005 report by the HSE Eastern Region, obtained by Village under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, the HSE suspected some of the children who had gone missing from their care were being used for trafficking or prostitution. The report said, "Research in other countries has identified a pattern of traffickers placing separated children in care until they are ready to move them on into illegal employment." It continued, "We cannot underestimate the vulnerability of this group in care." The report said "substantial resources" were required "for the provision of appropriate placement to reduce the risk of young people going missing from the service" and that gardaí had expressed concern about the lack of staff in hostels when they had visited to investigate the cases of missing children. [3]
The children, schools and families select committee of the House of Commons said it was concerned at the number of suspected victims of child trafficking who go missing from local authority care. The extent of the problem has been exposed by the Guardian, which revealed this month that one in eight unaccompanied asylum-seeking children go missing from care around ports and airports.[4] Grant is only payable if a child arrives alone and has never been cared for. Although local authorities also have a responsibility for children who become unaccompanied as a result of family breakdown after their arrival, they cannot claim grant for these children.[5]
At least 64 unaccompanied asylum-seeking children went missing from the Health Service Executive's care in the Republic of Ireland in 2004 - 51 of whom are still yet to be found, it was revealed this week.[1] In the eight months to December 2008, 86 of the 474 unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the care of Kent county council went missing.[4] Eighteen asylum-seeking teenagers in the care of the Health Service Executive have gone missing from care so far this year, according to the HSE's latest figures. This figure is 12 per cent of the total number of asylum-seeking minors taken into care this year, 155.[3] A spokesperson for the HSE said a group was currently reviewing services to unaccompanied minors, "with the aim of achieving efficient processes in the best interests of the children and young people concerned, consistent with relevant legislative and policy provisions". The group is due to complete its work by the end of the year.[3]
At the end of 4 years, the applicant may apply for indefinite leave. We normally grant this unless there are specific reasons against it, for example a criminal conviction. Unaccompanied children granted 4 years ELR may therefore generally expect to be allowed to remain in the UK permanently after the 4 years has expired, provided that they apply for ILR shortly before their 4 year ELR stay expires. At this stage caseworkers will consider the safety of return. [5] The committee also called for the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) to assume formal joint responsibility with the Home Office for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children.[4] A spokesperson for the east coast area, one of Ireland's 11 HSE areas, said that it was in negotiations with the Department of Health and Children for additional resources for working with unaccompanied asylum-seeking children.[1]
The committee heard evidence from the Refugee Children's Consortium, which argued that more emphasis was put on immigration control than on children's welfare. This, the consortium said, was partly due to the fact that unaccompanied asylum-seeking children are the only group of children in the UK for which responsibility lies entirely outside the DCSF's remit.[4] Cabrini Gibbons, a legal officer at the Irish Refugee Council, accused the Garda of making less effort to raise public awareness when an unaccompanied asylum-seeking child went missing than when an Irish child disappeared.[1] We may not consider dispersal of a former unaccompanied child appropriate if, for example, the young person is in full time education or has younger siblings remaining in the care of the local authority.[5] Home Office Ministers have said that that no unaccompanied child will be removed from the UK unless we are satisfied that adequate reception and care arrangements are in place in the country to which he/she is to be removed.[5] Foreign children who arrive unaccompanied in the UK should be assigned a personal guardian to stop them being lured or taken from care for exploitation as prostitutes, domestic servants and other illegal roles, MPs said today.[4] IND's target for 2002/2003 is to make an initial decision on 65% of applications from unaccompanied minors within 2 months. The Immigration Rules are being amended to allow this change of policy; and IND is arranging training for staff who will be responsible for interviewing children.[5]
The problem of missing children is complex and multifaceted. There are different types of and causes for missing children, such as family abductions, endangered runaways, non-family abductions, and lost, injured, or otherwise missing children (including disappeared, unaccompanied minors seeking asylum). It is not possible today to obtain comprehensive statistics across the European Union regarding missing and sexually exploited children.[6] While it is Government policy to disperse asylum seekers aged 18 and over, dispersal is not automatic for former unaccompanied minors. We consider each case on its merits.[5]
RANKED RECOMMENDED SOURCES
(6 source documents numbered in order of appearance in text)
The United States had received reports of 73 cases of parental abductions involving 104 children in Japan, said Michele Bond, the U.S. State Department's deputy assistant secretary for overseas citizen services. In 29 more cases, all family members were in Japan, but the U.S. parent was denied access to a child after a separation or divorce, she said. [1] The Winnipeg Police Service and Child Find Manitoba would like to remind parents the importance of being proactive in teaching their children about personal safety.[2]
The European Commission provides funding through a dozen community programmes for actions in favour of children and young people, notably concerning violence, safer use of Internet, trafficking in human beings, sexual tourism, participation of young people in the functioning of democracy, access of Roma children to education, etc. On the basis of these past actions, and in full respect of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the European Commission's Communication on the Rights of the Child is a formalised framework of the European Commission's work to protect the interests of children and young people and promote their role in society.[3] To strengthen its actions in favour of children and young people, the European Commission issued a Communication "Towards an EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child" in July 2006.[3]
4.2. SOCIAL SERVICES
We want to raise awareness for the children for health facilities, counseling, cultural awareness, treatment centers and education facilities. We want to help build for these children??? s futures and stop the violence against women for our future generations. To make it a successful journey we need names of the loved ones from the family members, spiritual guidance, donations, volunteers, walkers, drummers, singers, vehicles, drivers, community involvement, medical supplies, food, accommodations, water, adequate clothing and footwear, letters of support and lots of love and respect for the families of these beautiful women. With unyielding support from the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, First Nations Summit, Assembly of First Nations, Canadian Union of Postal Workers, Public Service Alliance Canada, Amnesty International, BC Government Employees Union, United Native Nations, Native Women??? s Association of Canada, Longshoreman??? s Union Local 500, BCGEU, BC Federation of Labor Most importantly, the support and love of the people of this nation, Canada. [4]
"A young person (under age 18) who is carrying out significant caring tasks and assuming a level of responsibility for another person which would usually be taken by an adult". Many children and young people who live with parents with difficulties, such as mental ill health, or substance misuse, take on caring and domestic responsibilities for the parent and/or siblings/other family members. These may include personal care, administering medication, checking up on or taking out the carer, domestic chores, and paperwork. Young carers are often not identified as such and they, or their parents, may be reluctant to seek help or advice because of issues of stigma or fears of family break up if services become aware of their circumstances. They may not be aware of what help is available.[5] The Department of Justice estimates that "440,000 children are lost or otherwise missing each year, including children abducted by a stranger or acquaintance; children abducted by a parent or family member; and children who are abandonedthrown awayor told to leave home." It also says that "450,000 children and young people run away from home every year."[6]
Where a child/young person is missing from a Local Authority placement, the Safeguarding & Specialist Services/Police guidance ' Responding to Children and Young People who are Missing from Placement ' is to be followed instead.[5] Safeguarding & Specialist Services must ensure that there is a system for keeping and referring to the notifications of children and/or pregnant women who are missing and that duty/intake staff are kept informed.[5] Every case of a missing child/young person/pregnant woman must be considered for referral to Safeguarding & Specialist Services for Initial Assessment of need and, if necessary, child protection enquiries.[5] Where a missing child is subject to a Child Protection Plan and is not found within 20 working days (of initial notification to Safeguarding & Specialist Services) the Review Child Protection Conference must be brought forward to consider whether any other action should be taken.[5] If, following the above, the missing child/young person or pregnant woman has not been traced, a Strategy Meeting should be convened within two working days of Safeguarding & Specialist Services being notified that the child/young person/family or pregnant woman is missing.[5] Safeguarding & Specialist Services must ensure that there is a system for centrally collating relevant information relating to all incidents of a child/young person going missing from home, in order to develop a multi-agency co-ordinated response.[5]
Some conscientious ISP's are taking helpful steps to provide crime prevention education information to users but more assistance to law enforcement is needed. Other unwitting persons who benefit from Internet services include businesses who advertise on web sites for the purpose of drawing buyers to their products. Some businesses have been surprised to learn that their advertising banners have appeared on web pages featuring child pornography. Some of the responsibility for cyberspace safety and enforcement also lies with those who benefit from advertising on the Internet.[7]
Traditional law enforcement approaches based on community oriented policing theories are not applicable in the area of Internet crimes against children. In a community oriented policing services publication intended to guide police administrators in evaluating their local child pornography problem, writers Wortley and Smallbone (May 2006, p. 29) recommend a curious statistics-based method for analyzing the problem. The publication clumsily counsels administrators to understand their local problem by determining how many complaints related to child pornography have been investigated in their jurisdictions.[7] Investigators noted that in some cases, ISP's retained no information whatsoever, leaving investigations to a dead end. A small survey of law enforcement investigators in 2006 showed that the number one need of those who investigate Internet crimes against children was for improved responses from Internet service providers.[7]
The decision requires that in each Member State a series of freephone numbers beginning with "116" be reserved for harmonised services of social value. This includes the creation of freephone number 116 000, used in the case of missing children. In 2006, the European Commission's Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security launched its first Youth Competition, entitled "The European Union and the Rights of the Child". A similar initiative was taken in 2007 with a Youth Competition entitled "The European Union and Non-discrimination" and in 2008 with a Youth Competition entitled "The Right of the Child to Protection".[3]
During Green Ribbon of Hope month, the Winnipeg Police Service in conjunction with Child Find Manitoba is requesting the public's assistance in locating some of Winnipeg's missing children. The children pictured here are all missing and their families are desperately seeking information that could lead to finding them.[2] IND contacts the responsible social services department (and also the police if there is reason to believe the child may be a victim of trafficking/prostitution).[8] The social services department contacts IND ( Fax. 020 8760 3105 ) IND amends the case record to show that the applicant is an adult asylum seeker and informs the social services department, who arranges to send/direct applicant to NASS to apply for support.[8] IND issues a new ARC. The Refugee Council continues to offer support as at "C" above if the social services department assesses the applicant as an adult but the applicant wishes to pursue a challenge to IND's/Social Services' assessment.[8]
F. Where IND has decided to treat the applicant as an adult ( and referred to NASS if appropriate ) but the applicant claims support from social services department direct. The social services department decides on their responsibility to the applicant and assesses the age of the applicant. If the social services department agrees with IND, they tell the applicant and refer him or her to NASS if appropriate. The social services department will also notify NASS and IND of their involvement and share reasons for their decision on age.[8]
The social services department refers the applicant to NASS and the Refugee Council if support is required.[8] IND issues an Application Registration Card (ARC). In some cases (by agreement and depending on age and risk) IND direct applicants to social services rather than escort them. If social services disagree with IND's assessment and say the applicant is an adult as claimed, IND treats the applicant as an adult asylum claimant and refers him or her to NASS if support is required.[8] As of the date of the hearing (April, 2006), to Mr. Waters' knowledge, the child in the video had not been identified (U.S. House of Representatives, January, 2007). Internet service providers, credit card companies, social networking sites, gaming sites, providers of chat rooms, e-mail services and those who advertise in Cyberspace are all among the facilitators who are caught in the middle of the Internet crime problem.[7] More than 80 people, including 22 children, were killed during the raid. Two years later, Reno wants to help the children again, this time by forming a new federal task force to "coordinate the delivery of federal services to missing children and their families." Those services include a national hotline, FBI investigations, searches conducted by U.S. Marshals and Customs officers, and parcel inspection by the U.S. Postal Service.[6] The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) service collects data describing the saturation of law enforcement officers within various regions of the U.S. In 2004 there were 675,734 sworn officers who provided law enforcement services to more than 278 million people nationwide (Dept. of Justice, FBI, 2004).[7]
The center works closely with the Justice Department, the Customs Service, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and other government agencies, and has been described by Treanor as a "wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary" of the Office of Juvenile Justice. Though the center maintains its official status as a private organization, it receives $3 million annually, nearly half (45 percent) of its budget, via a grant from the Department of Health and Human Services. The center's funding depends upon its political appeal in Congress and appearance of necessity to the public: High numbers of missing children seem to justify the center's continued funding with federal tax dollars.[6] Coverage up to $100,000 can be pur chased, and the minimum premium is $5,000. Overestimated figures and public insecurity are very powerful means of inflating demand for such services. Treanor maintains that "groups such as Child Find, Contact Center, and the National Child Safety Council can do the job better, cheaper, and without the kind of nauseating self-promotion campaign which has become the number one priority of the NCMEC."[6]
4.3. SPECIALIST SERVICES
The NCMEC offers a na tional computer network, access to the FBI's "missing person" and "wanted person" files, public service announcements, photos, posters, and training for law enforcement officers.[6] Head Teachers should inform the EWO and Safeguarding & Specialist Services immediately if a child/young person who fits one of the categories listed above appears to be missing. Where a Health professional has concerns regarding a child/young person/unborn baby's welfare and the child/young person/family/pregnant woman is missing, reasonable enquiries should be made with the GP/Health Visitor/School Nurse to ascertain their whereabouts.[5]
Head Teachers should inform the Education Welfare Officer (EWO) about any child/young person who has not attended school for ten days without provision of reasonable explanation. The EWO should make reasonable enquiries, such as home visit, liaison with Safeguarding & Specialist Services or Housing and notify the school if it appears that the child/young person has moved out of the area. The EWO should contact the School Nurse for information and should inform her if it appears the child/young person has moved out of the area.[5] If the child/young person is the subject of court proceedings or a court order, Corporate & Legal Services must be informed. Safeguarding & Specialist Services must contact all local agencies/professionals, including Education and Health, who are involved with the child/young person to inform them of the situation and to seek any information that may assist in the search.[5] Some families who have experienced homelessness and are placed in temporary accommodation by Local Authorities under the main homeless duty can have very transient lifestyles. It is important that effective systems are in place to ensure that the children from homeless families receive services from health and education as well as any other specific types of services because these families move regularly and may be at risk of becoming disengaged from services.[5] The specific needs of mixed parentage and refugee children should be given attention, in particular the need for neutral, high quality, gender appropriate translation or interpretation services for children and families whose preferred language is not English.[5] Such children will need legal advice which can be obtained free from the Refugee Legal Centre, Immigration Advisory Service, or Law Centre (Northern Ireland).[8] If the child/young person remains untraced, consideration should be given to making a referral to Safeguarding & Specialist Services for Initial Assessment of need and, if necessary, child protection enquiries.[5] In August 1994, Preferred Contingency Insurance Services (PCIS), a Beverly Hills insurance company, began to offer non-custodial child abduction coverage, underwrit ten by Lloyds of London.[6] Reporting of child pornography by electronic communication service providers.[7] Where notified of a child in any of the circumstances listed above, Safeguarding & Specialist Services must inform the relevant Police and Police Vulnerability Unit without delay.[5] The Strategy Meeting must include representatives from Safeguarding & Specialist Services, Police, Health, Education (if a school-age child) and any other agency that has current or recent involvement with the child/young person/family or pregnant woman.[5]
The letter should be sent to the Custodian of the Child Protection List for distribution to the other Child Protection List Custodians in the specified areas, who in turn should circulate within Safeguarding & Specialist Services and to local agencies.[5] Citizen Internet users may be willing to designate a dollar from their monthly Internet service bill to be dedicated specifically towards the investigations of crimes against children. Those funds could then be used to hire and train more investigators dedicated specifically to the job of identifying and apprehending offenders who use the Internet to commit crimes against children.[7] The quiet collision of young people and sex offenders on the Internet has resulted in a desperate but sometimes purposefully ignored cyber-struggle for the protection of children. Those who abuse minors make extensive use of computers and the Internet.[7]
4.4. INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER
The European Commission has long been concerned about the protection of children and young people inside and outside of Europe. It therefore takes part in this day by distributing to its entire staff the "forget-me-not" flower with an information note. [3] Stay up to date and get all the latest information on people finder services on the internet.[9] For Internet service providers, preserving information and providing it to law enforcement in response to legal process is an unwanted and unprofitable chore.[7] When the investigator approached the Internet Service Provider, Comcast, to request the customer information for the Internet protocol address, Comcast replied that it had not retained the customer records for that address.[7] In January 2007, Cook County Illinois police arrested three adults who used Craigslist, a free Internet advertising site, to offer the sexual services of girls as young as 14 years old.[7]
In 2002, an Arizona Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force undercover officer posing online as a young girl was contacted by a man who requested a meeting for sex. When the man went to the location where he believed that he would meet the minor he was arrested. Investigators learned that the offender had previously met two girls whom he had victimized and to whom he had given sexually transmitted diseases. In their shame, the girls had never notified their parents of the crimes. The girls' distraught parents only learned of the offenses when detectives informed them of the suspects' confessions (Phoenix Police Department, Report No. 2002-2233604). In some cases, a child's natural curiosity leads them to Internet places where they do not belong, and with sad results.Beginning at the age of 13, a California boy was repeatedly victimized by offenders who met him via the Internet after first seeing his image on a web cam. The boy suffered sexual abuses at the hands of the men who had first contacted him online. Some of the boys Internet acquaintances had assisted him in operating commercial pornography websites featuring sexual images and videos of himself (Eichenwald, December 19, 2005).[7]
According to an analysis of the Justice Department figures by the Statistical Assessment Service, an independent organization that examines research findings, 19 percent of the "lost" children misunderstood parental instructions; another 12 percent forgot the time. In all, 73 percent of those lost were home within 24 hours. Among runaways, STATS reports, half returned home within two days, and 73 percent of parents were aware of their child's location. Those most closely associated with missing children also dispute the attorney general's claims.[6]
Gibbons warned that some of the missing children could be working illegally in the Republic and that others could be at risk of sexual exploitation. Alan Corbett, national clinical director at children's charity Children at Risk in Ireland, added that some of the missing children may have been sexually abused in their home countries, making them more likely to be abused again. A spokesperson for the Garda denied that missing Irish children were considered more important, arguing that whether the child was an asylum seeker or Irish made no difference to the amount of publicity they would try to generate.[10]
Today, using undercover techniques and the Internet, investigators can seek out and identify abusers. Although these are the greatest advancements in the history of crimes against children, law enforcement still cannot take full advantage of the innovations. Proactive undercover methods can identify those who lure and entice minors towards sexual abuse.[7] In luring/enticement cases involving actual teens, few of the minors who are victimized ever report the crimes. Victimized teens are often too embarrassed to notify law enforcement and fearful of their parents' wrath for disobeying rules against communicating with strangers online. Sometimes a teen returns home after secretly meeting an Internet stranger without his or her parents ever discovering the illicit tryst.[7]
4.5. HUMAN SERVICES, SECRET SERVICE
The DOJ does not gather statistics about the number of citizens who use the Internet and no information is reported in the UCR about the number of law enforcement officers engaged in battling offenders who use the Internet to victimize minors.[7] Internet Service Providers should be mandated to retain subscriber data and required to respond promptly to legal process from law enforcement.[7] A small tax on Internet service providers with the proceeds dedicated towards supporting investigative (not citizen education) efforts towards apprehending Internet sex offenders.[7] Internet service providers (ISP) are the unwitting facilitators of Internet crimes against children.[7] The Internet crime problem craves increased resources for law enforcement services, training and equipment.[7]
Most ISP's charge a fee for service and individual subscribers often pay with credit cards. The subpoena and search warrant response process can be time-consuming for both law enforcement and the ISP's. [7]
The Refugee Council notifies the relevant social services department and invites their comments on/participation in the age assessment.[8] The task force is composed of administrators from the FBI, the DEA, the Secret Service, the Customs Service, Health and Human Services, and the Defense Department, as well as several Justice Department offices.[6] The administration has proposed 20 times the entire Innocent Images budget for abstinence-only education programs through the Department of Health and Human Services.[7]
Federal agencies including the FBI, ICE, U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Marshalls Service and even the Secret Service are making increased efforts to assist in the efforts but more personnel and funding is needed.[7] Its role is to provide independent guidance and support to ensure that the child is aware of his/her rights and the services to which he/she is entitled throughout the asylum process.[8]
IND staff will involve social services in any case where there is concern about the child's relationship with the 'responsible' adult.[8] In borderline cases IND gives the applicant the benefit of the doubt and treats the applicant as a minor. Social workers should contact IND by fax on 020 8760 3105 if they want IND to alter the accepted age to under or over 18. It is recognised however that the medical determination of age is an inexact science and the margin of error can be substantial, sometimes by as much as 5 years either side.[8]
If the applicant has no legal adviser, the Refugee Council will arrange for the necessary advice and assistance if the applicant wishes to challenge the social services department's assessment.[8] The European Commission has adopted the Decision "Commission Decision of 15 February 2007 on reserving the national numbering range beginning with 116 for harmonised numbers for harmonised services of social value".[3] If, for example, they arrive in the United Kingdom 'out of hours' the Immigration Service may have no option but to keep them overnight until they can be collected by a social worker in the morning.[8] Social services also inform the Refugee Council and any legal representative as appropriate.[8]
Self-care skills, including the child's understanding of the implications of their immigration status and the skills required to manage transitions. The responsible Safeguarding & Specialist Services should provide services for the UASC on the basis of the above assessment, irrespective of their immigration status.[5]
Reluctant ISP's will be unable to turn a blind eye to the crimes and might be forced to become partners in justice instead of facilitators of injustice. Children can easily become a political afterthought because they do not make financial contributions to political campaigns and they do not vote. Teens cannot organize and hire influential lobbyists to represent them before legislators. Minors are the mute and powerless constituents of well-intentioned elected officials who are unknowingly blind to their victimization.[7]
IND also tells the applicant about the services offered by the Refugee Council and gives contact details.[8] A. An Immigration Officer or a member of the Asylum Screening Unit staff tell the applicant that he or she does not accept the applicant's claim to be a minor, and so will be putting the asylum claim through adult procedures unless the applicant can produce acceptable evidence to substantiate the age claimed. The Asylum Screening Unit provides the applicant with a letter confirming that he or she is being treated as an adult for asylum purposes.[8] For the first time in history, law enforcement officers in the 21st century possess proactive methods to identify and bring to justice those who sexually abuse minors.[7] Unfortunately, a very few law enforcement agencies have personnel devoted to proactive investigations of offenders who lure and entice minors.[7] Until effective safeguards are in place, minors who become victims of Internet sex offenders are not receiving the equal protection and due processes guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. More work is needed to resolve these constitutional conflicts.[7] Undercover officers posing as minors have been very successful in identifying hundreds of offenders who have also committed contact "hands-on" offenses against real victims (Kardasz, April 25, 2008). Investigative operations can also identify those who traffic images and videos depicting the sexual exploitation of minors.[7] The true facts about the sexual victimization of minors is so psychologically distressing that few can emotionally tolerate being deeply involved in the investigations.[7]
RANKED RECOMMENDED SOURCES
(10 source documents numbered in order of appearance in text)